I’m Drowning – A researcher-patient’s plea for broader inclusion in cystic fibrosis trials

By: Ella Balasa

I’ve always known cystic fibrosis (CF) is a progressive disease; it destroys lung cells, tightens the small airways in the bottom of my chest, and each day takes me closer to the time when it will have ravaged my lungs. I had never really questioned if there was some way this process could be altered. I accepted that it couldn’t.

Recently, however, this has changed. The epicenter of new CF research is the development of medications that will slow, stop, and hopefully even reverse the effects and damage that CF inflicts on the body. The possibility of the cells in my lungs functioning to their full potential — with CF transmembrane conductance regulator protein function restored and working correctly, expelling chloride out of my cells, hydrating the surface of my lungs, and halting the thick sticky mucus that has caused my airways to be enveloped in a suffocating cloak for all these years — is like a feeling of being rescued when you are drowning.

Unfortunately, I am still drowning.

“I’m very sorry, Ms. Balasa, but you will not be able to be a participant in this clinical trial.” This was the response I received during one of my searches for these drug trials. Excited by the possibility of participating, finding one recruiting at my local adult clinic, I reached out to study coordinators and was informed that I met all but one criterion to participate in the studies. This specific criterion has prevented me from prior trial participation involving other investigational medications treating the symptoms of CF, including anti-infectives and anti-inflammatories.

Most CF studies, including phase I, II, and III trials, require a lung function minimum of at least 40% FEV1 (forced expiratory volume in one second). My FEV1 is 25%, so I am excluded from these trials. Many patients face a similar situation. The 40% threshold biases samples toward a young patient population, as this degenerative condition causes steadily decreasing lung function with time. Furthermore, as CF treatment has rapidly progressed and increased patients’ life expectancies, there are now more adults with CF in the U.S. than children, according to the CF Foundation Patient Registry.

As a patient who works in the science field, I started to ask myself: Where does that number come from? Should this one variable be such a deciding factor? Are we getting comprehensive results from these studies if a subset of patients is omitted? Are investigators using eligibility criteria from a prior study without determining whether the exclusions are scientifically justifiable?

To continue reading, please visit MedPage Today.

Sound Pharmaceuticals to present initial data on the STOP Ototoxicity Study at Cystic Fibrosis Conference

SEATTLESept. 25, 2018 /PRNewswire/ — Sound Pharmaceuticals (SPI) is pleased to announce that its recent submission to the upcoming North American Cystic Fibrosis Conference (NACFC) Oct. 18-20 has been selected as a late-breaking abstract. This presentation will focus on the incidence and severity of ototoxicity in CF patients undergoing intravenous (IV) tobramycin treatment for acute pulmonary exacerbation. Ototoxicity (hearing loss, tinnitus, vertigo or dizziness) is a common side effect of tobramycin and other aminoglycoside antibiotics (amikacin, gentamycin and streptomycin). Currently, there are no FDA approved therapies for the prevention or treatment of ototoxicity or any other type of sensorineural hearing loss, tinnitus, or dizziness. Continue reading Sound Pharmaceuticals to present initial data on the STOP Ototoxicity Study at Cystic Fibrosis Conference

Telavancin Promising Potential Treatment Option for MRSA in Cystic Fibrosis Patients

By Kristi Rosa

Responsible for several issues ranging from skin infections and sepsis to pneumonia and bloodstream infections, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus continues to plague patients in the health care and community setting, as well as the providers who treat them.

When acquired in patients with cystic fibrosis, clinical outcomes are known to be even worse, affecting several organs—primarily the lungs—and resulting in an increased rate of declined respiratory function as well as infections that can have severe, and sometimes deadly, consequences.

Now, however, for the first time, investigators have found that telavancin—a drug that is currently used to treat skin infections and hospital-acquired pneumonia—has potent in vitro activity and low resistance development potential when used against S aureus isolates in patients with cystic fibrosis, making it a promising potential treatment option for this population.

“Telavancin (TLV) is a lipoglycopeptide antibiotic approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2009 for the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections and in 2013 for the treatment of cases of nosocomial pneumonia, however its application for the treatment of CF-MRSA pneumonia infections was not known, so our studies are contributing to extending the application of TLV for CF treatment,” Adriana E. Rosato, PhD, associate professor in the department of Pathology and Genomic Medicine at Houston Methodist Research Institute told Contagion®. “We were also inspired by the fact that CF patients have a short life time—until 40 to 50 [years]—so our priority is to contribute to better treatment in this patient population.”

Dr. Rosato and her team hypothesized that TLV might be a promising treatment option for CF-patient-derived MRSA and MSSA infections, as in vitro studies have shown that TLV has activity against MRSA.

To prove this, the investigators screened a total of 333 strains of CF patient-derived S aureus of the wild-type or small-colony-variant phenotype, collected from both adults and children at 3 different cystic fibrosis centers: Houston Methodist Research Institute, UW Health and the Center for Global Infectious Disease Research. TLV was found to display activity against all 333 strains collected.

When testing the activity of the drug against 23 MRSA strains, the investigators observed intermediate resistance to ceftaroline (CPT)—a new beta-lactam antibiotic that targets PBP 2a in MRSA—in 20 of the strains, and high-level resistance to CPT in 3 of the strains. The authors note that although high levels of resistance to CPT is rare, intermediate resistance is more common in patients who have chronic infections.

“Among all strains, the TLV MIC90 was 0.06 mg/liter, i.e. 8-fold lower than the daptomycin (DAP) and CPT MIC90 and 25-fold lower than the linezolid (LZD) and vancomycin (VAN) MIC90,” the authors write.

Using time-kill experiments, the investigators assessed the in vitro effectiveness of TLV compared with DAP, VAN, and CPT. They found that TLV showed activity against all tested strains and displayed rapid bactericidal activity as well. The activity profile for the drug at a free serum concentration of 8 mg/liter showed that TLV performed better than VAN (16 mg/liter), LZD (10.4 mg/liter), and CPT (16 mg/liter).

The investigators also set out to determine the fate of mutation selection that could be projected by the potential prolonged use of TLV in patients with cystic fibrosis. To do this they looked at 3 specific strains: AMT 0114-48, WIS 664, and TMH 5007. They found that due to the ease of mutation selection which had been noted in control strains, TLV mutant resistance is independent of the CF patient background of the strains.

“We demonstrated that TLV has bactericidal activity against the S aureus strains tested, including those against which CPT and LZD displayed reduced activity, which might provide TLV a significant advantage over the drugs currently used to eradicate those strains and prevent future exacerbations,” the study authors write.

A clinical trial is currently underway to assess the pharmacokinetic profile of TLV in patients with cystic fibrosis, who usually need dose adjustment because of an increase in the volume of distribution and clearance.

“[The next step for our research is] to perform in-vivo analyses studies that could lead to translational application/clinical trial,” Dr. Rosato added. “However, we are limited in research funds to continue our investigations.”

Original article here.

Machine learning to help cystic fibrosis decision-making

By James Hayes

New research claims to have demonstrated that machine learning techniques can predict with a 35% improvement in accuracy – in comparison to existing statistical methods – whether a cystic fibrosis patient should be referred for a lung transplant.

The research, led by Professor Mihaela van der Schaar of the Alan Turing Institute at the University of Oxford, has been generated through a partnership between The Alan Turing Institute and charity the Cystic Fibrosis Trust. Continue reading Machine learning to help cystic fibrosis decision-making

AIT’s Inhaled Nitric Oxide Shows Potential in Fighting Bacterial Infection Prevalent in CF Patients

By Alice Melao

Inhaled nitric oxide (NO) was shown to be an effective antibacterial agent against Mycobacterium abscessus infection in preclinical studies, as well as in a pilot clinical trial, according to AIT Therapeutics.

The company discussed the latest data on its NO product in two poster presentations during the 3rd Annual World Bronchiectasis Conference held recently at Georgetown University in Washington, D.C.

NO is a small molecule that is an important mediator of immune defense mechanisms against infections. The compound has been shown to have broad-spectrum antibacterial activity against several strains of bacteria that often infect patients with underlying lung diseases, including cystic fibrosis (CF).

Continue reading AIT’s Inhaled Nitric Oxide Shows Potential in Fighting Bacterial Infection Prevalent in CF Patients

Phage-Coated Microparticles Treats Lung Conditions like CF

By SterlingAdmin

The methods available to treat bacterial infections are many. But among those with any real and lasting effectiveness, their usage is limited. Antibiotics were once the Holy Grail of medicine to deal with devastating diseases that wiped out entire populations. With them, these suffering conditions were almost entirely wiped out and the populace began to learn how to live without the fear of most children dying at a young age. But, as is well known, the age of antibiotic cure-alls is ending and the time of antibiotic resistance is beginning to reach its peak. So, medical researchers are hard at work on all the other opportunities for dealing with bacteria that don’t require these specific groups of compounds.

The Medicine of Viruses

Phage therapy is one such alternative that has begun to see more extensive use over the past two decades.Bacteriophages are lifeforms that have crafted over evolutionary time a niche focused on using bacteria as their reproductive hosts, killing said host in the process. And since they are living beings as well, they actively engage in the selective pressures of finding ways around resistance against them, rather than being a static attack on bacteria like antibiotics are. This means that even the most feared multi-drug resistant bacterial strains have little to no protection against phages.

The primary downside to this treatment is that phages are highly specialized, having formed themselves to only target a particular host species. Therefore, to deal with certain bacteria, one also has to find and be able to cultivate a certain type of phage. Once that step is accomplished, however, it has been found that they can be altered fairly easily to give them variable methods of attack, so as to minimize any potential side effects on the human body while they are killing the bacteria. They can even be set up to synergistically interact with the human immune system to work together to wipe out the bacterial invasion.

With the right phage strain, the largest remaining issue is how to get them into the human body and to the right type of location and system that the bacteria are also attacking from. A large proportion of phage research has gone into finding new ways to do this very thing, as it is one of the inefficient areas of the therapy and, if improved, can drastically heighten the success rates of the treatment and the types of bacterial diseases that can be combated.

It is difficult and time consuming to produce modified phage, with many of them dying in this fabrication. For bacterial diseases of the lungs, such as the kinds that like to colonize those suffering from cystic fibrosis, there is currently no true delivery method of getting phage into the deep lung tissues. And, of course, getting any single treatment approved requires showing success in some sort of animal model, even though the phages may not translate well or at all to anything other than humans. This is one of the major problems this author has with the current approval setup by governments for medical trials.

Microparticles For A Micro World

Scientists at the Georgia Institute of Technology have been seeking a new method for just such a delivery system. Dry powder formulations has seen some positive benefits for effectiveness in recent years, but there lingers the issue of how to use such a powder to delivery living phages to the right spot. To do so would require a very carefully made powder indeed.

The engineering techniques they brought into play were used to make phage-loaded microparticles (phage-MPs), hollow molecular structures formed using water-oil-water emulsion to keep them stable. The bacteria being combated was the opportunistic pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa and several strains of phage against it were chosen for the experiment.

The microparticles were housed in a phage-containing solution, allowing them to be filled with the phage after incubation. Though they were filled in a different way than the usual method of them being inside the MPs. Instead, they cover the exterior in this method after the MPs are made, meaning no phage are lost due to solvent usage during MP fabrication from the prior ways other studies used. Three to five phages were contained on the MPs in order to reduce the likelihood of any possible bacterial resistance.

This delivery mechanism also reduces endotoxin production by the phage, thereby minimizing side impacts of their use, with the reduction bringing them down to 0.078 endotoxin units (EUs), far below the accepted FDA limit of 20 EU in treatments. The technique was first tested on petri dishes containing the bacteria to which the phage-MPs were applied. The P. aeruginosa were modified to express green fluorescent protein (GFP) to identify their living location on the plates.

A Complete Victory

After 16 hours of co-incubation, large patches of non-fluorescence showed where the phage had successfully killed off the bacteria, while the control group MPs without a phage coating had no deaths. These zones were also far larger than the applied MP area, showing that the phage were able to spread and extend to other bacteria in the dishes. The same test was done using synthetic sputum to mimic the environment of an animal lung and the bacteria and phages were applied at the same time. There was no visible growth of bacteria after application, showing that the phages were able to both control and wipe them out. A further test showed the phage are also able to get past the protective biofilms of the bacteria that they make under environmental emergencies.

The dry powder formulations were also seen to have a large burst of phages initially, with slow release for two weeks after, the perfect way to allow consistent application and treatment against the bacteria. The final experiment involved using mice infected with the bacteria. A control test using just phage-MPs showed no negative effects on the mice or their lungs after application. Fluorescent phage-MPs also showed that they were only localized to the lungs and nowhere else in the body, as desired. The control using free form phages without microparticles revealed how the dry powder still didn’t allow them to be properly applied, with no major phage levels detected in those mouse lungs, proving that the MPs as a transport vector were required.

When tested on mice infected with P. aeruginosa, the bacterial count dropped by an entire order of magnitude and 100% of the mice survived their pneumonia, while the untreated control group only had 13% survive. For mice with a cystic fibrosis genetic mutation, the same test saw their bacterial counts drop by three orders of magnitude, approaching the limit of what could be detected. The phage-MPs also saw the same effectiveness against multiple strains of the bacteria, meaning that even genetic variance in a population wasn’t enough to defend against them.

A last point of importance is that when testing against a mouse group exposed to phage-MPs long before being infected and later treated, there was no reduction in effect and no antibodies against the phages seemed to develop. So there is likely no performance loss to the treatment if used multiple times.

The New Antibiotics

As a conclusion, the researchers were able to engineer specialized biomaterials made of microparticles that, when coated with bacteriophages, were highly effective at reducing bacterial counts for lung-related diseases, including those resulting from the lowered immune system responses of cystic fibrosis. These phage-MPs are stable and can be stored for a fair amount of time with no loss in phage amounts and can be administered through simple inhalation, meaning younger patients can be treated with less complications.

For lung-related diseases, and likely for broader conditions at large in the medical community, this breakthrough might serve as a major way to allow phage therapy to become more common and used in replacement of or as a sought after alternative to antibiotics. The number of lives this should be able to save in the long run is likely incalculable.

Press Article Link

Study Link

Original article Link

Harmful Bacteria Replace Beneficial Ones in Gut of CF Patients

By Vijaya Iyer

Cystic fibrosis (CF) patients have a higher amount of harmful gut bacteria and increased levels of intestinal inflammation than healthy people, according to researchers.

Their study, “Altered intestinal microbiota composition, antibiotic therapy and intestinal inflammation in children and adolescents with cystic fibrosis,” was published in the journal PLOS One.

CF predominantly affects the lungs, but it can also cause gastrointestinal complications. The CFTR protein defect (the cause of CF) is abundant in the gastrointestinal tract of patients and affects the normal structure of the intestine. This defect could influence the diversity of the bacteria present in the gut (also called the gut microbiome). Continue reading Harmful Bacteria Replace Beneficial Ones in Gut of CF Patients

A Cost-Utility Analysis Of Vertex’s CF Drugs — What It Teaches Us About Trial Design

By Claudia Dall’Osso, Ph.D., Ian Love, Ph.D., and Nuno Antunes, Ph.D., Decision Resources Group (DRG)

Commercial success in the pharmaceutical industry requires that clinical programs, in addition to demonstrating clinical effectiveness, also provide data supporting a drug’s value. The Institute for Clinical and Economic Research (ICER), a U.S.-based cost-effectiveness watchdog, recently released an analysis suggesting that Vertex Pharmaceuticals’ cystic fibrosis (CF) franchise — Kalydeco, Orkambi, and the recently launched Symdeko — while offering meaningful clinical efficacy, would require discounts of approximately 70 percent1 to be cost-effective.

Here, we review ICER’s cost-effectiveness analysis of the Vertex CF franchise to highlight lessons for orphan drug developers related to clinical trial designs and outcome metrics that would facilitate more favorable cost-effectiveness evaluations by stakeholders who employ cost-utility modeling (e.g., ICER, U.K.’s National Institute for Health and Care Excellence [NICE]).

Calculating The Cost-Effectiveness Of Vertex’s Cystic Fibrosis Franchise

In a cost-utility model, health economic analysts strive to calculate the incremental cost to gain an extra quality-adjusted life year (QALY); they estimate a therapy’s impact on the level of utility patients are deriving from their life based on their health status and incorporate these data into a quantitative estimate of QALYs (Figure 1). The goal of the cost-utility analysis is to determine whether a therapeutic intervention changes the QALYs that patients will accumulate over a set time period (e.g., lifetime), and at what added cost. The threshold for what is considered an acceptable incremental cost per QALY varies by stakeholder; ICER typically presents a sensitivity analysis across a range of thresholds (e.g., $50,000 to $500,000 per QALY for an ultra-rare disease like CF).

In our view, data gaps opened the possibility of a potential undervaluation of the Vertex CF transmembrane conductance (CFTR) modulators on several metrics and, ultimately, on overall survival in the context of the ICER model. Vertex’s pivotal clinical trials captured the effect of CFTR modulators on the two organs chiefly affected in CF — the lungs and the pancreas — with outcome metrics for pulmonary function, percent-predicted 1-second forced expiratory volume (ppFEV1), and pulmonary exacerbation rate, as well as pancreatic sufficiency (body weight) (Figure 2). However, data on metrics assessing emerging complications (e.g., CF-dependent diabetes or bacterial infections), impact on use of other medications (e.g., pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy, mucolytics), reduction in healthcare resource utilization, or reduction in disease burden were far more limited, but these attributes were included in ICER’s cost-effectiveness analysis. Lacking clear clinical trial data on the metrics outlined above, health economists relied on arguably conservative assumptions to estimate the impact of the Vertex CFTR modulators on these domains. Because the Vertex CF franchise has a relatively short market history, and the long-term risks/benefits of the drugs are incompletely understood, assumptions to model the long-term impact of these medicines were also necessary.

For instance, to evaluate survival, ICER modeled the impact of CF-related diabetes in its analysis of CF patients’ health status. Owing to the dearth of clinical trial data on CF-related diabetes in the development program for the Vertex drugs, the company’s CFTR modulators were assumed not to impact this outcome (Figure 2). Treatment with the Vertex CFTR modulators was also conservatively assumed to have no long-term impact on weight after an initial increase and, without long-term data, the drugs’ impact on ppFEV1 beyond two years of treatment was modeled as a 50 percent reduction in the rate of ppFEV1 decline.

Notably, several CF experts interviewed by DRG consider it possible that early treatment of newborns could prevent disease development. The potential impact of early treatment with CFTR modulators on disease development and survival was not explored in the ICER analysis; although little data is available to support such an impact of the Vertex drugs, ICER has considered such scenarios largely unsupported in other evaluations (e.g., a cost-effectiveness evaluation of Spark Therapeutics’ Luxturna for the treatment of retinitis pigmentosa).

The translation of clinical trial data to utility is a second area wherein a manufacturer may lose traction in a cost-utility analysis, if the utility calculation isn’t sufficiently comprehensive or if the drug’s data package is insufficient to support its impact on all relevant metrics. In the ICER analysis of the Vertex franchise, health economists used the ppFEV1 metric to derive a utility curve by assigning a level of benefit to a specific ppFEV1 value. Although this is the most straightforward approach, it also results in an assessment of health benefits that relies exclusively on a mechanical respiratory metric, which may not adequately capture the quality of life experienced by patients, especially considering the multi-organ nature of CF. Indeed, at the May 17 presentation of the ICER model, stakeholders from the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation levied this criticism. Furthermore, ICER’s sensitivity analyses showed that changes in the relationship between ppFEV1 and utility could significantly affect the overall cost-effectiveness assessment. Notably, an alternative scenario in which the utility was increased by 5 percent, to account for clinical effects of a drug beyond pulmonary function, led to a 15 percent decrease in the cost-effectiveness ratio.

Similarly, the impact of the Vertex franchise on payer budgets in the ICER model related only to pulmonary supportive care, while other non-pulmonary expenses remained unchanged — an assumption made in the context of available data, but one that may not fully reflect the benefit of the drugs. Furthermore, the CFTR modulators did not impact the burden of supportive care for CF patients in the model, nor did they impact patients’ productivity. Ultimately, suboptimal alignment of clinical trial data with the demands of a comprehensive (e.g., multi-organ) cost-effectiveness model may have diminished the opportunity for the Vertex franchise to perform maximally in this cost-utility analysis.

Key Lessons And Takeaways For Drug Developers

Although clinical outcome data collected by Vertex was sufficient to gain an FDA green light, it was not sufficient to support a comprehensive analysis of cost-effectiveness in this multi-organ disease. As such, assumptions regarding drug impact were necessary in areas not adequately supported by data, opening the possibility for a suboptimal cost-effectiveness evaluation. To support more favorable and data-supported evaluations, developers should design clinical trials with an eye on cost-effectiveness.

  • Prior to initiating clinical trials, manufacturers should consider how a health status model is likely to be designed to assess cost-effectiveness. They should consider enrolling the assistance of academic researchers to understand which metrics may be important in such a model and to aid in the development of a reliable model in an area where none is established. With this analysis in mind, developers should strive to design a clinical program that covers relevant metrics and the durability of a drug’s impact on them. Indeed, an alternative scenario developed by ICER showed that a change in the long-term effectiveness assumption on ppFEV1 would have a profound impact on the final cost-effectiveness assessment; for Kalydeco, assuming no decline in ppFEV1 after the first two years (rather than 50 percent) decreased the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio ($ per QALY) by approximately 35 percent.
  • Developers should work to understand how key clinical metrics in a given disease area are translated into utility. In a disease with an established function, it is prudent to carefully survey the relevant literature. When developing a pioneering treatment, manufacturers should consider investment into the development of a utility curve that accurately accomplishes this, which would likely facilitate a reliable QALY calculation or at least more detailed/specific alternative scenarios and sensitivity analyses.
  • Understand the patient journey and track healthcare resource utilization during a clinical trial to more fully support an accurate assessment of cost of care, as a favorable impact on direct healthcare costs is important to attain widespread reimbursement.
  • Although metrics such as burden of care, caregiver burden, or productivity loss are difficult to rigorously track, they can be immensely valuable in highlighting the favorable indirect effects of disease-modifying drugs beyond the clinical efficacy. Understanding patients’ pain points and, ideally, tracking these metrics when possible (e.g., with real-world data or social media listening analyses) may further strengthen and support conventional metrics from clinical trials.

As market access hurdles intensify, and ICER’s analyses increasingly inform payer policy, anticipating and preparing for cost-utility analyses early in the design of a clinical program will be paramount to support a medicine’s value proposition with U.S. insurers.

Original article found here.

Cinnamon Oil Compound Might Block Bacteria Like P. aeruginosa from Forming Biofilms

By: Alice Melao

A natural component found in cinnamon oil, known as cinnamaldehyde or CAD, may be able to prevent Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteria from spreading in an organism and inhibit their ability to form antibiotic-resistant biofilms, researchers show.

These findings may support further study into anti-microbial medications that can help control the behavior of these so-called superbugs, or treatment-resistant bacteria, which represent a serious healthcare problem for people with cystic fibrosis and other diseases.

The discovery was reported in “Cinnamaldehyde disrupts biofilm formation and swarming motility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa,” published in the journal Microbiology.

“Humans have a long history of using natural products to treat infections, and there is a renewed focus on such antimicrobial compounds,” Sanjida Halim Topa, PhD, a researcher at Swinburne University of Technology in Australia, and lead study author, said in a university news release. “Natural products may offer a promising solution to this problem.”

Cinnamaldehyde, one of the major components of cinnamon oil, is responsible for its characteristic flavor. This compound is known to have antimicrobial activity against many bacteria, including P. aeruginosa; a stomach ulcer-causing bacteria called Helicobacter pylori; and Listeria monocytogenes, which is responsible for the food-borne infection listeriosis.

“We hypothesized that using natural antimicrobials, such as essential oils, might interfere in [drug-resistant] biofilm formation,” Topa said. “Though many previous studies have reported antimicrobial activity of cinnamon essential oil, it is not widely used in the pharmaceutical industry.”

Working with researchers at Nanyang Technological University in Singapore, the team conducted several experiments to evaluate the impact of different concentrations of cinnamaldehyde on P. aeruginosa biofilms.

They found that non-lethal amounts of the essential oil compound could disrupt by 75.6 % antibiotic-resistant, preformed P. aeruginosa biofilms. Cinnamaldehyde was found to prevent the production of a bacterial-signaling protein essential for bacteria communication and biofilm formation. [Biofilms, or microbe communities whose growth is facilitated by the thick and sticky mucus that marks CF, are known to promote antibiotic resistance in P. aeruginosa lung infections.]

In a concentration-dependent manner, cinnamaldehyde also could reduce the motility of the bacteria, preventing them from spreading elsewhere, the scientists reported.

These findings, the researchers wrote, show “CAD can disrupt biofilms and other surface colonization phenotypes through the modulation of intracellular signaling processes.”

They are now investigating the use of cinnamaldehyde embedded-wound dressings as a way to treat skin infections.

Original article here.

Positive Data from the CARE CF 1 Clinical Study of Oral Lynovex in Cystic Fibrosis Exacerbations

NovaBiotics Ltd (“NovaBiotics”) announces that its oral therapy for cystic fibrosis (CF), Lynovex®, has met the study objectives of the CARE CF 1 clinical trial.

CARE CF 1 assessed the effects of two weeks of Lynovex treatment as an adjunct to standard of care therapy (SOCT) in CF, compared to placebo plus SOCT. This trial was designed to determine whether the inclusion of Lynovex capsules alongside SOCT lessened the clinical impact of exacerbations in adults with CF, as measured by symptom severity and levels of bacteria and inflammatory mediators in sputum and blood.  CARE CF 1 was a 6-arm study with the primary objectives of determining the optimal dose and regimen of Lynovex in patients with exacerbations of CF-associated lung disease and to further evaluate the safety and tolerability of Lynovex in exacerbating CF patients.  Continue reading Positive Data from the CARE CF 1 Clinical Study of Oral Lynovex in Cystic Fibrosis Exacerbations